The two bills coming up in the South Dakota legislature: one allowing the transfer of big game tags for landowners with more than 320 acres and the other restricting access of game wardens on private land are both bad for wildlife management in the state.
The first is going to create a whole new class of pay-to-hunt activities that will make deer herd management even more difficult. Yes, I understand that deer cuase trouble for farmers and ranchers. Yes I know that these same farmers and rancher work hard to make a living in a tough economy. But I still don’t beleive that wildlife should be for sale. I do believe the GF&P should offer more antlerless deer permits in a region to help control the herd and landowners in those regions should allow more hunters to come in and take deer. The other side of that equation is hunter actions. First, most hunters are so in love with antlers they don’t want to take antlerless deer. That’s sad. Good deer management revolves around knocking back the doe population. And good venison recipies start with young, tender antlerless deer. The final part of hunter activities includes the failure of some hunters to act responsibly and ethically. Where as the love of antlers is just sad. Unethical hunting, trespassing, failure to close gates and all the other things landowners hate about hunters should be crimes. They way a few hunters act, it’s no wonder landowners don’t want hunters on their land. So this question has no easy answer, but getting something good often takes hard work. Hunters in every community should have a landowner appreciation banquet each year and the GF&P should show up at the banquet with a big stack of antlerless deer permits to help answer some of the concerns.
Now the second bill…keeping wardens off private land… well that’s a little bit more cut and dried in my eyes. If you want to encourage poaching, if you want to encourage unethical behavior in the field, if you want to increase discord between landowners and hunters… simply pass a law that says game wardens can’t go on private land. I will go out on a limb here and say what lots of people feel… those supporting this bill want to hide something.
Does the hatred for game wardens and the job they do run so deep that our lawmakers feel they should put up roadblocks to the enforcement activities? If there are overzealous game wardens that overstep their bounds and act in a manner that is illegal or violates someone’s rights, those individual wardens should be punished severely and removed from the force. And the process for filing a complaint against a warden should be easy, transparent and open for public review. Anything less is the government trying to hide something.
I believe most of the game wardens in South Dakota, and indeed in all of the U.S., are dedicated law enforcement officers looking out for the good of the hunters and wildlife they are sworn to protect. The desire to block game wardens from private land begins with a sentence like this: This is my land…
Well, the unspoken end of that sentence is this: …I can do whatever the hell I want on it.
The truth is, you can’t do whatever the hell you want on it. There are boundaries and rules. Game wardens are there to enforce the rules. The game on the land is held in trust by the state for ALL the people. Unless you want to adopt the European model hunting management, let the game wardens do their job.